Rh-53 Helicopter Parts

End item NSN parts
Filter By: Annular Ball Bearings
page 1 of 1
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
115-KSZZ Annular Ball Bearing
000943418
115KSZZ87 Annular Ball Bearing
000943418
11621308 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
119354-01 Annular Ball Bearing
006469421
121-45309 Annular Ball Bearing
001018552
176448 Annular Ball Bearing
000943418
177642 Annular Ball Bearing
001677914
200KDDGC7FS50160 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
200KDDGFS50160 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
200KDDGFS50166B Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
200KDDGFS56700 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
200SFFGL107E006A75C4124R Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
31162-55 Annular Ball Bearing
009980540
31162-88 Annular Ball Bearing
009980540
6006C3 Annular Ball Bearing
002045035
62002ZNJLT10 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
62002ZNRJC3 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
6200ZZNCE1BT2 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
A-A-59583 Annular Ball Bearing
002045035
A10265 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
Page:

Helicopter, Rh-53

Picture of Rh-53 Helicopter

The CH-53 Sea Stallion is the most common name for the Sikorsky S-65 family of heavy-lift transport helicopters. Originally developed for use by the United States Marine Corps, it is in service with Germany, Iran, Israel, and Mexico. The United States Air Force operated the HH-53 "Super Jolly Green Giant" during the late– and post–Vietnam-War era, updating most of them as the MH-53 Pave Low.

The dimensionally-similar CH-53E Super Stallion is a heavier-lifting, improved version designated S-80E by Sikorsky. Its third engine makes it more powerful than the Sea Stallion, which it has replaced in the heavy-lift mission.

In 1960, the United States Marine Corps began to seek a replacement for their HR2S piston-powered helicopters. On 27 January 1961, the Marine Corps began working with the other three U.S. armed services on the "Tri-Service VTOL transport", which would eventually emerge as the Vought-Hiller-Ryan XC-142A tiltwing. The design became more elaborate and the program stretched out, causing the Marines to drop out when they decided they would not receive a working machine in a satisfactory timeframe. In the end, the XC-142A, although a very innovative and capable machine, never entered production.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide