Rh-53 Helicopter Parts

(Page 30) End item NSN parts page 30 of 33
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
65207-03005-041 Butt Hinge
009398582
65207-03053-041 Access Door Hinge
000279177
65207-03053-042 Access Door Hinge
000278993
65207-09004-137 Hinge-half
010073379
65207-10042-042 Ramp Floor Assembly
000145787
65207-10042-046 Ramp Floor Assembly
000145787
65207-10042-051 Ramp Floor Assembly
001639445
65207-10086-101 Receiver Assembly
001097079
65207-10088-102 Ramp Fitting
001682151
65207-10089-101 Roller Stowage Ramp Fitting
000145789
65208-04010-042 Tread Assembly
009157026
65208-04018-101 Support X
009157028
65209-08023-041 Special Fitting Assembly
012429636
65209-08023-042 Special Fitting Assembly
012429636
65209-09027-103 Special Bushing
001502546
652400-103 Scale Dial
005827778
65251-08219-041 Landing Gear Torque Arm Assembly
011266160
65251-08261-041 La End Cap Assembly
001598124
65255-02022-101 Sealing Washer
008645783
65255-02038-101 Sleeve Bushing
009465318
Page: 30

Helicopter, Rh-53

Picture of Rh-53 Helicopter

The CH-53 Sea Stallion is the most common name for the Sikorsky S-65 family of heavy-lift transport helicopters. Originally developed for use by the United States Marine Corps, it is in service with Germany, Iran, Israel, and Mexico. The United States Air Force operated the HH-53 "Super Jolly Green Giant" during the late– and post–Vietnam-War era, updating most of them as the MH-53 Pave Low.

The dimensionally-similar CH-53E Super Stallion is a heavier-lifting, improved version designated S-80E by Sikorsky. Its third engine makes it more powerful than the Sea Stallion, which it has replaced in the heavy-lift mission.

In 1960, the United States Marine Corps began to seek a replacement for their HR2S piston-powered helicopters. On 27 January 1961, the Marine Corps began working with the other three U.S. armed services on the "Tri-Service VTOL transport", which would eventually emerge as the Vought-Hiller-Ryan XC-142A tiltwing. The design became more elaborate and the program stretched out, causing the Marines to drop out when they decided they would not receive a working machine in a satisfactory timeframe. In the end, the XC-142A, although a very innovative and capable machine, never entered production.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide