H 53 Seastallion Parts

(Page 13) End item NSN parts page 13 of 16
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
65651-03501-069 Metal Tube Assembly
000719772
65651-03501-070 Metal Tube Assembly
000719773
65651-03501-071 Metal Tube Assembly
000719774
65651-03501-079 Metal Tube Assembly
000719777
65651-03501-080 Metal Tube Assembly
000719782
65651-03502-048 Metal Tube Assembly
000443852
65651-03502-049 Metal Tube Assembly
000443856
65651-03502-051 Metal Tube Assembly
000540113
65651-03502-057 Metal Tube Assembly
000704924
65651-03502-063 Metal Tube Assembly
000704956
65651-05500-088 Metal Tube Assembly
000540093
65651-06501-049 Metal Tube Assembly
000695787
65651-09501-044 Metal Tube Assembly
000683650
65651-09501-058 Metal Tube Assembly
008631576
65651-11054-041 Manifold Housing Assembly
001051749
65651-11500-079 Metal Tube Assembly
000443833
65652-03106-041 Link Assembly
009157881
65652-03111-101 Connector
009157660
65652-03126-101 Spacerxservocylinde
009157670
Page: 13

H 53 Seastallion

Picture of H 53 Seastallion

The CH-53 Sea Stallion is the most common name for the Sikorsky S-65 family of heavy-lift transport helicopters. Originally developed for use by the United States Marine Corps, it is in service with Germany, Iran, Israel, and Mexico. The United States Air Force operated the HH-53 "Super Jolly Green Giant" during the late– and post–Vietnam-War era, updating most of them as the MH-53 Pave Low.

The dimensionally-similar CH-53E Super Stallion is a heavier-lifting, improved version designated S-80E by Sikorsky. Its third engine makes it more powerful than the Sea Stallion, which it has replaced in the heavy-lift mission.

In 1960, the United States Marine Corps began to seek a replacement for their HR2S piston-powered helicopters. On 27 January 1961, the Marine Corps began working with the other three U.S. armed services on the "Tri-Service VTOL transport", which would eventually emerge as the Vought-Hiller-Ryan XC-142A tiltwing. The design became more elaborate and the program stretched out, causing the Marines to drop out when they decided they would not receive a working machine in a satisfactory timeframe. In the end, the XC-142A, although a very innovative and capable machine, never entered production.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide