Rh-53 Helicopter Parts

(Page 12) End item NSN parts page 12 of 33
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
200KDDGFS50160 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
200KDDGFS50166B Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
200KDDGFS56700 Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
200SFFGL107E006A75C4124R Annular Ball Bearing
005165318
20112-8 Electrical Equipme Mounting Base
005646680
2045-5 Electrical Insulation Tape
008324298
2046-112 Electrical-electronic Heat Sink
012515166
2051509 Diode Semiconductor Device
000869165
2066741 Metallic Eyelet
007275133
2066741-1 Metallic Eyelet
007275133
2067006 Electromagnetic Relay
007827924
2069900046 Electrical Insulation Tape
008324298
2082-4156-20 Fixed Attenuator
011577870
20825399-001 Rotary Switch
009438047
209-030-539-1 Loop Clamp
003579602
210-82234-10 Quick Disconnect Coupling Half
000604840
21466 Rupturable Disk
004854294
21650 Mounting
006776046
216723 Electrical Conduit Coupling Nut
002803311
21757 Special Screw
001033350
Page: 12 ...

Helicopter, Rh-53

Picture of Rh-53 Helicopter

The CH-53 Sea Stallion is the most common name for the Sikorsky S-65 family of heavy-lift transport helicopters. Originally developed for use by the United States Marine Corps, it is in service with Germany, Iran, Israel, and Mexico. The United States Air Force operated the HH-53 "Super Jolly Green Giant" during the late– and post–Vietnam-War era, updating most of them as the MH-53 Pave Low.

The dimensionally-similar CH-53E Super Stallion is a heavier-lifting, improved version designated S-80E by Sikorsky. Its third engine makes it more powerful than the Sea Stallion, which it has replaced in the heavy-lift mission.

In 1960, the United States Marine Corps began to seek a replacement for their HR2S piston-powered helicopters. On 27 January 1961, the Marine Corps began working with the other three U.S. armed services on the "Tri-Service VTOL transport", which would eventually emerge as the Vought-Hiller-Ryan XC-142A tiltwing. The design became more elaborate and the program stretched out, causing the Marines to drop out when they decided they would not receive a working machine in a satisfactory timeframe. In the end, the XC-142A, although a very innovative and capable machine, never entered production.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide