F404 Engine Parts

End item NSN parts
Filter By: Electrical Receptacle Connectors
page 1 of 1
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
10131426 Electrical Receptacle Connector
011196178
DCMME13W6P Electrical Receptacle Connector
000077452
J22-0006-516 Electrical Receptacle Connector
000077452
M81511-51FF01P1 Electrical Receptacle Connector
010654247
M81511/49FE01S2 Electrical Receptacle Connector
010898790
M81511/49WE01S2 Electrical Receptacle Connector
010898790
M81511/51WF01P1 Electrical Receptacle Connector
010654247
MIL-C-38999 Electrical Receptacle Connector
011196178
MIL-C-81511/49 Electrical Receptacle Connector
010898790
MIL-C-81511/51 Electrical Receptacle Connector
010654247
MILC5015 Electrical Receptacle Connector
010305121
MS27466T15B15P Electrical Receptacle Connector
011196178
MS3402D16S-1S Electrical Receptacle Connector
010305121
MS3404D16S1S Electrical Receptacle Connector
010305121
Page:

F404 Engine

Picture of F404 Engine

The General Electric F404 and F412 are a family of afterburning turbofan engines in the 10,500–19,000 lbf (47–85 kN) class (static thrust). The series are produced by GE Aviation. Partners include Volvo Aero, which builds the RM12 variant. The F404 was developed into the larger F414 turbofan, as well as the experimental GE36 civil propfan.

GE developed the F404 for the F/A-18 Hornet, shortly after losing the competition for the F-15 Eagle's engine to Pratt & Whitney, and losing the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) competition to the Pratt & Whitney F100 powered YF-16. For the F/A-18, GE based the F404 on the YJ101 engine they had developed for the Northrop YF-17, enlarging the bypass ratio from .20 to .34 to enable higher fuel economy. The engine was designed with a higher priority on reliability than performance. Cost was the main goal in the design of the engine.

GE also analyzed "throttle profiles" and found that pilots were changing throttle settings far more often than engineers previously expected; putting undue stress on the engines. GE also sought with the F404 a design that would avoid compressor stalls and other engine failures, and would respond quickly to control inputs; a common complaint of pilots converting from propeller planes to jets were that early turbojets were not responsive to changes in thrust input. GE executives Frederick A. Larson and Paul Setts also set the goal that the new engine would be smaller than the F-4's GE J79, but provide at least as much thrust, and cost half as much as the P&W F100 engine for the F-16.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide