F404 Engine Parts

End item NSN parts
Filter By: Diode Semiconductor Devices
page 1 of 1
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
10486 Diode Semiconductor Device
008239975
12032-0024 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
1N953 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
2088468-4 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
2302 Diode Semiconductor Device
008239975
235-9058P4 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
3510018-013 Diode Semiconductor Device
008239975
353-3620-010 Diode Semiconductor Device
008239975
44381 50201 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
5082-2302 Diode Semiconductor Device
008239975
720701-7REVA Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
A2302 Diode Semiconductor Device
008239975
GS810HP1 Diode Semiconductor Device
002852222
HC7005 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
JAN1N5188 Diode Semiconductor Device
002852222
L2088468-4 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
MIL-S-19500/424 Diode Semiconductor Device
002852222
RELEASE3739 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
TK5800400-3021 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
VVC448 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
Page:

F404 Engine

Picture of F404 Engine

The General Electric F404 and F412 are a family of afterburning turbofan engines in the 10,500–19,000 lbf (47–85 kN) class (static thrust). The series are produced by GE Aviation. Partners include Volvo Aero, which builds the RM12 variant. The F404 was developed into the larger F414 turbofan, as well as the experimental GE36 civil propfan.

GE developed the F404 for the F/A-18 Hornet, shortly after losing the competition for the F-15 Eagle's engine to Pratt & Whitney, and losing the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) competition to the Pratt & Whitney F100 powered YF-16. For the F/A-18, GE based the F404 on the YJ101 engine they had developed for the Northrop YF-17, enlarging the bypass ratio from .20 to .34 to enable higher fuel economy. The engine was designed with a higher priority on reliability than performance. Cost was the main goal in the design of the engine.

GE also analyzed "throttle profiles" and found that pilots were changing throttle settings far more often than engineers previously expected; putting undue stress on the engines. GE also sought with the F404 a design that would avoid compressor stalls and other engine failures, and would respond quickly to control inputs; a common complaint of pilots converting from propeller planes to jets were that early turbojets were not responsive to changes in thrust input. GE executives Frederick A. Larson and Paul Setts also set the goal that the new engine would be smaller than the F-4's GE J79, but provide at least as much thrust, and cost half as much as the P&W F100 engine for the F-16.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide