F404 Engine Parts

(Page 11) End item NSN parts page 11 of 13
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
21C8842G01 Inspection Fixture
011670546
21C8843G01 Piston Ring Plier
011670547
21C8919G01 Aircraft Maintenance Fixture
013899732
22130 20407 Shouldered Washer
000569592
228550-4 Electrical Contact
003305813
23-9003 Shouldered Washer
000569592
2302 Diode Semiconductor Device
008239975
23207 Sediment Strainer Element
011396839
235-9058P4 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
245763-000 Electr Receptacle Connector Body
010335282
247ASC1609-001 Transistor
004946059
2493734 Round Self-locking Nut
011396791
2493807 Sediment Strainer Element
011247775
2497733 Sediment Bowl
012497842
2497757 Element Assembly Oil
012247438
2498976 Indicator And Bowl
012142791
2650385 Tube Connector
003944583
2653164 Plain Tapered Pin
012660422
2653164-05 Plain Tapered Pin
012660423
2653164-1 Plain Tapered Pin
012660424
Page: 11

F404 Engine

Picture of F404 Engine

The General Electric F404 and F412 are a family of afterburning turbofan engines in the 10,500–19,000 lbf (47–85 kN) class (static thrust). The series are produced by GE Aviation. Partners include Volvo Aero, which builds the RM12 variant. The F404 was developed into the larger F414 turbofan, as well as the experimental GE36 civil propfan.

GE developed the F404 for the F/A-18 Hornet, shortly after losing the competition for the F-15 Eagle's engine to Pratt & Whitney, and losing the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) competition to the Pratt & Whitney F100 powered YF-16. For the F/A-18, GE based the F404 on the YJ101 engine they had developed for the Northrop YF-17, enlarging the bypass ratio from .20 to .34 to enable higher fuel economy. The engine was designed with a higher priority on reliability than performance. Cost was the main goal in the design of the engine.

GE also analyzed "throttle profiles" and found that pilots were changing throttle settings far more often than engineers previously expected; putting undue stress on the engines. GE also sought with the F404 a design that would avoid compressor stalls and other engine failures, and would respond quickly to control inputs; a common complaint of pilots converting from propeller planes to jets were that early turbojets were not responsive to changes in thrust input. GE executives Frederick A. Larson and Paul Setts also set the goal that the new engine would be smaller than the F-4's GE J79, but provide at least as much thrust, and cost half as much as the P&W F100 engine for the F-16.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide