F404 Engine Parts

(Page 12) End item NSN parts page 12 of 13
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
2653821 Dust And Moistur Protective Plug
011367900
2655624 Dust And Moistur Protective Plug
011403711
2661585 Bellows Bracket
011227835
2662317 Special Ball Bearing
011510813
2662322 Annular Ball Bearing
011403768
2662325 Annular Ball Bearing
011648812
2662555 Serrated Lock Ring
011367889
2663130 Recessed Washer
011227696
2663256 Hydraulic Servovalve
011227908
2663511 Dust And Moistur Protective Plug
011506866
2663575 Sealing Plug Assembly
012648096
2663810 Microporous Filtering Disk
011298495
2669756 Capacitor Assembly
013617584
2676935 Valve Disk
013324311
2683270 Airframe Ball Bearing
014213164
2845750-3 Disk Drive Motor
011725826
2906183-3 Electrical Contact
005923561
2BK41-506822-105 Electrical Contact
009459659
2N4035 Transistor
004946059
2N4035A Transistor
004946059
Page: 12

F404 Engine

Picture of F404 Engine

The General Electric F404 and F412 are a family of afterburning turbofan engines in the 10,500–19,000 lbf (47–85 kN) class (static thrust). The series are produced by GE Aviation. Partners include Volvo Aero, which builds the RM12 variant. The F404 was developed into the larger F414 turbofan, as well as the experimental GE36 civil propfan.

GE developed the F404 for the F/A-18 Hornet, shortly after losing the competition for the F-15 Eagle's engine to Pratt & Whitney, and losing the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) competition to the Pratt & Whitney F100 powered YF-16. For the F/A-18, GE based the F404 on the YJ101 engine they had developed for the Northrop YF-17, enlarging the bypass ratio from .20 to .34 to enable higher fuel economy. The engine was designed with a higher priority on reliability than performance. Cost was the main goal in the design of the engine.

GE also analyzed "throttle profiles" and found that pilots were changing throttle settings far more often than engineers previously expected; putting undue stress on the engines. GE also sought with the F404 a design that would avoid compressor stalls and other engine failures, and would respond quickly to control inputs; a common complaint of pilots converting from propeller planes to jets were that early turbojets were not responsive to changes in thrust input. GE executives Frederick A. Larson and Paul Setts also set the goal that the new engine would be smaller than the F-4's GE J79, but provide at least as much thrust, and cost half as much as the P&W F100 engine for the F-16.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide