F404 Engine Parts

(Page 9) End item NSN parts page 9 of 13
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
200336-1 Electrical Contact
005923561
2010T13P01 Spring Tension Washer
011227697
201298-3 Electr Receptacle Connector Body
010335282
201578-1 Electrical Contact
009459659
202-0001 Permanent Magnet Loudspeaker
007906539
202650-2 Electrical Connector Insert
001063803
204020P1 Transistor
004946059
2088468-4 Diode Semiconductor Device
000507309
21130-3 Special Stud
011581707
21196-16 Locked In Stud
012609437
21196-18 Locked In Stud
012565919
2188064-1 Rod End Plain Bearing
011387947
21C11417G01 Mechanical Puller
013699342
21C8001G01 Bearing Retainer
010908080
21C8001G01 REV D Bearing Retainer
010908080
21C8028G01 Module Puller-pusher
010936520
21C8039G04 Rotating Generator Adapter
011200468
21C8052G03 Fixture-drive Shaft
011548166
21C8062G01 Dust And Moisture Protective Cap
011060117
21C8106P01 Bushing Pusher
010900075
Page: 9 ...

F404 Engine

Picture of F404 Engine

The General Electric F404 and F412 are a family of afterburning turbofan engines in the 10,500–19,000 lbf (47–85 kN) class (static thrust). The series are produced by GE Aviation. Partners include Volvo Aero, which builds the RM12 variant. The F404 was developed into the larger F414 turbofan, as well as the experimental GE36 civil propfan.

GE developed the F404 for the F/A-18 Hornet, shortly after losing the competition for the F-15 Eagle's engine to Pratt & Whitney, and losing the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) competition to the Pratt & Whitney F100 powered YF-16. For the F/A-18, GE based the F404 on the YJ101 engine they had developed for the Northrop YF-17, enlarging the bypass ratio from .20 to .34 to enable higher fuel economy. The engine was designed with a higher priority on reliability than performance. Cost was the main goal in the design of the engine.

GE also analyzed "throttle profiles" and found that pilots were changing throttle settings far more often than engineers previously expected; putting undue stress on the engines. GE also sought with the F404 a design that would avoid compressor stalls and other engine failures, and would respond quickly to control inputs; a common complaint of pilots converting from propeller planes to jets were that early turbojets were not responsive to changes in thrust input. GE executives Frederick A. Larson and Paul Setts also set the goal that the new engine would be smaller than the F-4's GE J79, but provide at least as much thrust, and cost half as much as the P&W F100 engine for the F-16.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide