H 53 Seastallion Parts

(Page 2) End item NSN parts page 2 of 16
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
13414-025 R Shipping And Storage Container
005531539
13414-077 C Shipping And Storage Container
004858250
1428AS100 Nitrogen P Cylinder
011664677
1428AS100-1 Nitrogen P Cylinder
011664677
145E5911-101 Sling Assembly
011157001
14839 Motor Outer Shroud
004075763
14C02-16A Clam Shell Assembly
012750885
15024-100 G Shipping And Storage Container
010163451
15024-100A G Shipping And Storage Container
010163451
1510-00-1 Torquemeter Indicator
015152248
1538-8082-P1 Radio Frequency Cable Assembly
010460808
1560CH37-253-3 Sleeve Bearing
007872420
1607637-1 Sensitive Switch
008551649
166052-01-01 Torque Motor
011684256
1729AS100 G Shipping And Storage Container
010163451
177870-001 Indicator Base
009257636
177871-901 Plate Assembly
009257617
196897 Cruise Gu Indicator
009389571
1B2164 Metallic Particle Detector
012612816
2001-0206-03-1 Trigger Switch
013099939
Page: 2 ...

H 53 Seastallion

Picture of H 53 Seastallion

The CH-53 Sea Stallion is the most common name for the Sikorsky S-65 family of heavy-lift transport helicopters. Originally developed for use by the United States Marine Corps, it is in service with Germany, Iran, Israel, and Mexico. The United States Air Force operated the HH-53 "Super Jolly Green Giant" during the late– and post–Vietnam-War era, updating most of them as the MH-53 Pave Low.

The dimensionally-similar CH-53E Super Stallion is a heavier-lifting, improved version designated S-80E by Sikorsky. Its third engine makes it more powerful than the Sea Stallion, which it has replaced in the heavy-lift mission.

In 1960, the United States Marine Corps began to seek a replacement for their HR2S piston-powered helicopters. On 27 January 1961, the Marine Corps began working with the other three U.S. armed services on the "Tri-Service VTOL transport", which would eventually emerge as the Vought-Hiller-Ryan XC-142A tiltwing. The design became more elaborate and the program stretched out, causing the Marines to drop out when they decided they would not receive a working machine in a satisfactory timeframe. In the end, the XC-142A, although a very innovative and capable machine, never entered production.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide