H 53 Seastallion Parts

(Page 7) End item NSN parts page 7 of 16
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
65205-08030-041 Fuel Tank Skin Assembly
001111585
65205-08034-043 Aircraft Fairing
001111623
65206-01006-102 Aircraft Window Panel
009389589
65206-05004-108 Aircraft Window Panel
003176443
65207-01004-107 Follower Bearing
009389670
65207-01004-108 Follower Bearing
009389671
65207-01023-042 Aircraft Window Frame
000279292
65207-01051-106 Angle Bracket
000279291
65207-03002-122 Bell Crank
009413396
65207-03021-082 Door Sill Assembly
000278760
65207-03053-041 Access Door Hinge
000279177
65207-03053-042 Access Door Hinge
000278993
65207-08016-101 Cockpit Sleeve
000279281
65207-09004-133 Butt Hinge Leaf
010073373
65207-09008-082 Aircraft Access Door
000689972
65209-01003-101 Windshi Wiper Shaft
008242593
65209-02033-045 Brake Cylinder Cover
008503118
65209-03015-107 Nonmetallic Tubing Assembly
003514823
65209-08008-041 Air Structural Component Support
000278774
Page: 7 ...

H 53 Seastallion

Picture of H 53 Seastallion

The CH-53 Sea Stallion is the most common name for the Sikorsky S-65 family of heavy-lift transport helicopters. Originally developed for use by the United States Marine Corps, it is in service with Germany, Iran, Israel, and Mexico. The United States Air Force operated the HH-53 "Super Jolly Green Giant" during the late– and post–Vietnam-War era, updating most of them as the MH-53 Pave Low.

The dimensionally-similar CH-53E Super Stallion is a heavier-lifting, improved version designated S-80E by Sikorsky. Its third engine makes it more powerful than the Sea Stallion, which it has replaced in the heavy-lift mission.

In 1960, the United States Marine Corps began to seek a replacement for their HR2S piston-powered helicopters. On 27 January 1961, the Marine Corps began working with the other three U.S. armed services on the "Tri-Service VTOL transport", which would eventually emerge as the Vought-Hiller-Ryan XC-142A tiltwing. The design became more elaborate and the program stretched out, causing the Marines to drop out when they decided they would not receive a working machine in a satisfactory timeframe. In the end, the XC-142A, although a very innovative and capable machine, never entered production.

Compare Now »
Clear | Hide